Chat with us, powered by LiveChat Leadership and Vocation | Coms Paper
+1(978)310-4246 credencewriters@gmail.com
  

Attend a committee meeting in your health care organization. If you are not currently employed in a health care setting, you may elect to attend a committee meeting at another company, a community center, a local school, local chamber of commerce or other professional organization.Observe the interactions between committee members and the process used by the committee to arrive at decisions.In 500-750 words, describe the function of the committee and the roles of those in attendance. Describe your observations of the interactions between members of the committee and determine whether the process used to arrive at decisions is a form of shared governance.A minimum of two academic references from credible sources are required for this assignment.Submit the completed “Collaborative Committee Meeting Verification Form” with the assignment.Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.This assignment uses a grading rubric. Instructors will be using the rubric to grade the assignment; therefore, students should review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the assignment criteria and expectations for successful completion of the assignment.I will be attending a committee at Del Prado Medical Center which is a small medical practice that consists of a Doctor, a nurse practitioner, the owner of the place and some medical assistants. This is clinic that offers primary care for patients 18 and older.Course Code
AMP-450V
Class Code
AMP-450V-O501
Criteria
Content
Percentage
80.0%
Verification of Committee Attendance
30.0%
Comprehensive and Detailed Discussion of
Health Organization Committee Meeting
50.0%
Organization and Effectiveness
15.0%
Thesis Development and Purpose
5.0%
Paragraph Development and Transitions
5.0%
Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling,
punctuation, grammar, language use)
5.0%
Format
5.0%
Paper Format (Use of appropriate style for the
major and assignment)
2.0%
Research Citations (In-text citations for
paraphrasing and direct quotes, and reference
page listing and formatting, as appropriate to
assignment)
3.0%
Total Weightage
100%
Assignment Title
Collaborative Decision Making Through Shared Governance
Unsatisfactory
0-71% (0.00%)
Verification of attendance is not provided.
Discussion of health organization committee meeting is not
provided or is incomplete.
Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing
claim.
Paragraphs and transitions consistently lack unity and
coherence. No apparent connections between paragraphs
are established. Transitions are inappropriate to purpose and
scope. Organization is disjointed.
Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede
communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice
and/or sentence construction are used.
Template is not used appropriately or documentation format
is rarely followed correctly.
No reference page is included. No citations are used.
Total Points
200.0
Less Than Satisfactory
72-75% (75.00%)
Non applicable
Discussion of health organization meeting and observations is
provided but summary is unclear and inconsistent with the
concept of shared governance.
Thesis and/or main claim are insufficiently developed and/or
vague; purpose is not clear.
Some paragraphs and transitions may lack logical progression
of ideas, unity, coherence, and/or cohesiveness. Some
degree of organization is evident.
Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the
reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register), sentence
structure, and/or word choice are present.
Template is used, but some elements are missing or
mistaken; lack of control with formatting is apparent.
Reference page is present. Citations are inconsistently used.
Satisfactory
76-79% (79.00%)
Non applicable
Discussion of health organization meeting includes a listing of
observations and a brief description of committee functions.
Thesis and/or main claim are apparent and appropriate to
purpose.
Paragraphs are generally competent, but ideas may show
some inconsistency in organization and/or in their
relationships to each other.
Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not
overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence structure
and audience-appropriate language are used.
Template is used, and formatting is correct, although some
minor errors may be present.
Reference page is included and lists sources used in the
paper. Sources are appropriately documented, although
some errors may be present.
Good
80-89% (89.00%)
Non applicable
Discussion of heath organization meeting includes detailed
information regarding observations and interactions between
committee members.
Thesis and/or main claim are clear and forecast the
development of the paper. It is descriptive and reflective of
the arguments and appropriate to the purpose.
A logical progression of ideas between paragraphs is
apparent. Paragraphs exhibit a unity, coherence, and
cohesiveness. Topic sentences and concluding remarks are
appropriate to purpose.
Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may
be present. A variety of sentence structures and effective
figures of speech are used.
Template is fully used; There are virtually no errors in
formatting style.
Reference page is present and fully inclusive of all cited
sources. Documentation is appropriate and style is usually
correct.
Excellent
90-100% (100.00%)
Verification of attendance is provided.
Comprehensive summary of health organization meeting with
detailed information regarding observations, interactions,
and processes used to impart shared governance is provided.
Thesis and/or main claim are comprehensive; contained
within the thesis is the essence of the paper. Thesis
statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.
There is a sophisticated construction of paragraphs and
transitions. Ideas progress and relate to each other.
Paragraph and transition construction guide the reader.
Paragraph structure is seamless.
Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic
English.
All format elements are correct.
Comments
In-text citations and a reference page are complete. The
documentation of cited sources is free of error.
Points Earned

Purchase answer to see full
attachment

error: Content is protected !!